What is the market cap of Fox Finance (FOX)? Comparatively, the current price is - higher than the all-time low price. The lowest price paid for Fox Finance (FOX) is $0.000000000325, which was recorded on (9 months). What is the all-time low for Fox Finance (FOX)? Comparatively, the current price is - lower than the all-time high price. The highest price paid for Fox Finance (FOX) is $0.000000014542, which was recorded on (over 1 year). What is the all-time high for Fox Finance (FOX)? The trading volume of Fox Finance (FOX) is $4.53 in the last 24 hours, representing a 0.00% increase from one day ago and signalling a recent rise in market activity. What is the daily trading volume of Fox Finance (FOX)? Information will be updated if market activity resumes. With a circulating supply of 0 FOX, Fox Finance is valued at a market cap of -.įOX tokens have stopped trading 19 days ago on all exchanges listed on CoinGecko. This represents a - price increase in the last 24 hours and a - price increase in the past 7 days. That's why we play the games.The price of Fox Finance (FOX) is $0.000000000412 today with a 24-hour trading volume of. Make the people you pay to de-list also make Bing their default on site search engine. Removing valid results is going to make their date sorted results look even worse.ĭe-list a few key sites. No reason to think it might not work again here.Īnd finally, Google already has a problem in that they do a horrible job of blocking spam in their date sorted results. Getting news first has been a position of value that has worked for a long, long time. You can get ALL the news you need on Bing NOW, or you can wait, and wait, and wait for it on Google. Without question there will be a lag time. If Google doesn't have access to their output, they will have to wait for someone to actually re-write the story, probably after reading it on an AP or Reuters customer site (it's called plagiarism to some, fair use to others) and post it. Much of the news you think is original content is re-posted from Reuters and AP. If you haven't noticed, the number of reporters generating original reporting is falling like a rock. If Reuters and AP de-list, it will be a lot longer than you think. Many, like Henry Blodgett on Silicon Insider correctly make the point that news from de-listed sites will eventually find its way on to other sites and into the Google Index. Given the volume of news these two companies create, impacting the positioning of Google is not as far fetched as some may like to think. Just as critical, I don't think it takes a relatively large amount to get them on board. For the right amount of money you can get them to shut out Google and restrict downstream access of their content to Google faster than they can say, “Google Who?” That's how bad they need the money AND dislike Google, (this isn't just about news, Google Scholar is going after Reuter’s Westlaw as an example). To think they won't jump aboard and grab a cash offer from Microsoft that precludes Google is crazy. One thing they all have in common? They don't like the way Google has treated them and they all need money. Which makes the public positions of AP and Reuters and other top news sites all the more interesting. Then consider Microsoft's first move on Twitter and their investment in Facebook as an indicator they could be looking to stake out a position in the value of real-time information. If they can win enough categories, all of the sudden they have some bragging rights that set a platform for people to question Google's positioning. It won't change market share, but it could change how the battle between Google and Bing is fought. The advertisers for these categories go where they can get the most clicks. Or they can target to pay sites about Mesothelioma and other diseases that ambulance chasers covet and pay huge dollars per click through, or other high paying PPC searches. If they are able to corner some little corners, say sites about auto news, by paying bloggers and news sites in this category to go exclusive with Bing, they can trumpet it loud and far that if you want information about a new car, you have to go to Bing because, “they don't take Google.” (Did Visa’s They Don't Take Amex ad campaign work?”) They need the most popular searches in the categories they want to impact.īing just has to corner the market on specific categories. Here is why Bing paying Fox to de-list from Google can be a significant first step and can work:įirst, Bing doesn’t need to get the most popular sites to join Fox in de-listing. Particularly when it makes so much sense. But as things pop up, like news in the media saying that Microsoft is trying to entice Fox to “de-list” from Google, I can't pass up posting on it. Ok, I am getting bored talking about Fox and Google. Why Bing paying Fox to de-list from Google can be a significant first step and can work
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |