![]() ![]() The caveat is the noise, since it's pegged at 100% everything, but still performs close to what you'd like/expect. I think the selection of coolers is quite fine, since it's covering what I'd consider the good reasonable range (maybe adding a 240 AIO would be good?) and it demonstrated via CB, that after a certain point, the CPU even if throttling still performs fine-ish. Rluker5 said:Don't do it Al, It's a trap!Īlso as a side note, I saw a 200W max power dissipation in CB23 with my 12700k with a Mugen B, 240W with a NH-D15, and 260W on a 13900kf+CB23 with a Cooler Master ML280 in my personal, less controlled use.That is one of the other things I would have liked to see: a gaming test with those same conditions and coolers. ![]() Just to show a real world performance example for the 99%.Īlso as a side note, I saw a 200W max power dissipation in CB23 with my 12700k with a Mugen B, 240W with a NH-D15, and 260W on a 13900kf+CB23 with a Cooler Master ML280 in my personal, less controlled use. Sure my 12700k didn't see much difference in temps with my Prime Z690 P ILS, but there was a depression that will always be there at least a little.īut a typical gaming heavy power use test (like uncapped framerate at low resolution in CPU demanding game X with a potent GPU) with the different coolers, showing their clockspeeds and temps with no power limits would be nice. ![]() No way would I take my 13900kf that is a virgin to that ILS and soil it. There's still a few things I'd like you to check (using the normal ILS, for instance) and include that data, but overall, this is mighty impressive. Fran- said:Holy cow, I know you teased this yesterday in the Discord, but great work with this investigation. For more demanding tasks, something that makes use of all or most of the cores, a strong liquid cooler will improve performance by up to 12%, while also potentially allowing for overclocking headroom. For common, bursty tasks, even an entry-level aftermarket cooler will allow the CPU to run at its highest supported stock clock speeds. The level of cooling you’ll need for Intel’s Core i9-13900K will depend on the performance you expect out of it, as well as whatever power limit you set for the CPU. While it was still very quiet in this scenario, the SFF cooler was the loudest in this test at 2.1 dBA over ambient. Both of the mainstream air coolers measured at 0.9 dBA over ambient in this test, with the liquid cooler slightly louder, at 1.4 dBA over ambient. Lower power consumption causes the noise of the CPU cooler to fall below the noise created by the system fans (even while restricted to 35% speed). This is also the lowest level where I can measure reliable noise measurements. Because at 125W, any half-decent CPU cooler tends to run very quietly. I recommend those who prioritize PCs silence to set CPU power consumption to these levels. The lowest power limit I tested at is 125W. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |